[A cured fed a prepared topic Patriot]
GO Foods Long-term storable food in the vicinity of a 25-year shelf life!
http://survivalchef.mygofoods.com/
Our healthy, nutritious foods militia are easy to set up and serve for dinner tonight, shelf life, so that you can for future generations of the state, emergency preparedness, save heaven for uncertain seasons and can easily save ration with friends and loved ones. Learn more … http://nancys-world.com/
OPTIMAL Storable food on the planet …GoFoods
No MSG, no genetically modified organisms, and no hydrogenated fats None HFCS!
25 years of saving life
NUTRIENT security for the uncertain times ahead.
Recover all of SWOP, for the food
This may very well beryllium, the currency of the future!
Get your order in case of emergency supplies now while you still can!
Dormy application and become an associate NOW!
http://nancys-world.com/
http://survivalchef.mygofoods.com/
By Dr.Mercola
The “C” word, is probably the most dreaded word in health care there. The mere mention of cancer evokes images of death and despair. Cancer prevention, such as annual mammograms, the conventional go-to “prevention” strategy. But researchers increasingly agree that mammography is at best ineffective and at worst harmful … In November 2009, amended the U.S. Preventive Work Project Force, a federal advisory committee for foreigners whose cancer shows, recommendations, and said annual mammograms were not necessary that women under 50 years and that the screening was only recommended every two years after that1.The panel based the new guidelines for data that indicate that mammography is not more harm than good once used on younger women.
Besides the fact that ionizing radiation can be delivered in mammography cancer in and of itself lead to overdiagnosis of cancer, but also arsenic misdiagnosis has been shown that a major problem these signifiers of cancer screening plagued sein.Berichtet in a Nordic study, April 2 will be released this year are as many as 1 in 4 women with rigorously diagnosed through body tissue cancer that if left antisocial, they would never have caused harm.FDA whistleblower claim qualified Dicey mammography equipment
On 15 July showed the parvenu York Times that the agency staff working in intensive spying operation against five informants within the organization3 and “FDA-enemy” is in collaboration with the informant be muss.Nach information the NYT:
“What quickly than a narrow study of the likely disclosure of confidential information to the Agency by five scientists grew from mid-2010 in a much wider war to negative outside critics of the Agency’s medical review process, according to the cache of more than 80,000 pages of computer documents from The monitoring effort produced.Move to suppress, which is a memorandum that “cooperation” of the FDA’s opponents with the title, identified the surveillance operation, 21 employees of the Agency, Congressional officials to work outside medical researchers and journalists design together, hurt by denial and “slanderous” information about the agency.
…The incredible surveillance effort grew out of a bitter dispute many years between the scientists and their bosses claimed element of the FDA scientists that faulty analysis techniques in the agency had the sanction of medical imaging devices for all mammograms and colonoscopies that LED-exposed patients dangerous levels of radiation. ”
Element, a longtime critic of the mammogram, I am familiar can deal with the kind of harassment, the FDA, so it does not surprise me, the agency would sink so low as to spy on its critics.
However, justifying the FDA spied on and harassed hired their relevant scientific professionals to ensure the safety of devices such as mammogram accurately assessed, because these employees found serious health hazards that the agency would prefer to continue to ignore in order to get out of their clients protect the industry? It is totally unconscionable and there’s nary a good defense.Good news: fewer young women are getting mammograms
While the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines of the unused initial strong protests from advocacy groups, cancer, mammography for women in their 40s are Blüte4 gezündet.Berichtet recent findings by the Mayo Clinic5:
“Performed Presented second week, with an annual research meeting, the study data from 100 health plans in the United States are specifically astatine the number of mammograms from January 2006 to December 2010 analyzed, researchers found a decline of 6 percent in the vicinity under the women aged 40 to 49Meanwhile, the number of mammograms in women aged 50-64 has remained stable, like the same panel recommended that women need to be reviewed every two years.
“We root for that message,” says Dr. Elizabeth Whelan, ACSH. She summary that still too many people there are nary damage in a mammography always believe the Task Force study showed that this is clearly not the case. “We now have reason to hope that the influence of the USPSTF guidelines will only increase , which means that we see a decline in the number of women who undergo unnecessary procedures such as radiation therapy, mastectomy or lumpectomy.”
Cancer diagnosis, yet a solemn Concern
According to Dr. Otis Brawley, author, master practitioners of the American Cancer Society, the term “overdiagnosis” of cancer medicine TO6:
“… A neoplasm that each laboratory criteria are referred to cancer, but if left alone fulfilled, would not hurt. This is a tumor, not the will to push to spread and kill. It is a tumor that can be cured with treatment, only not to be pyrogenic and / or cured. ”
The problem is according to a report published by CNN back in April, related to progress within technology7.Seen as mammograms in a position to tiny and tiny spots in the diagnostic films, a chance overtreatment increases exponentially when overzealous doctors insist that more testing, and invasive MRI with dye and rubbed biopsies on women who have the misfortune , a small town have to be done in their X-ray.
Concerns about over-diagnosis of both breast and prostate cancer increases like the ELD. (Reported by Dr. Webb Brawley, an estimated 60 pct of prostate cancer are harmless tumors that are not necessary, treatment.)
Norway supports the findings of various studies before, such as the Cochrane review of 20 098, which resulted in this part of the body cancer screening at a rate of 30 percent of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, which actually increases risk of falling ill of the dead from cancer found by 0.5 percent. The review concluded that for every 2,000 women invited for screening over a period of 10 years, life was just a woman, pulled out, while 10 healthy women were treated unnecessarily. Another 200 women suffer mental stress and damage to several months due to false alarms.
Mammograms are very inaccurate for women with dense Brustgewebe.New York and Virginia recently passed laws that are packed next to women in the breast glucinium informed that they need to find alternative screening methods.
Mammography no deaths linked to the mitigation of …
Another Norwegian study, published in 2010, found that the decline in mortality from screening mammography was so small as to be nonexistent and articles thereof-a specified 2.4 deaths per 100,000 person-years were spared a result of the element screening9.Another study in The Lancet Oncology published last year10 end, describing the natural history of breast cancer cases in the Swedish mammography screening program from 1986 to 1990, involving 650 000 women festgestellt.Da breast lesions and tumors are treated aggressively and / or removed before they have the ability to determine with some certainty in a clear and immediate threat to their well-being, has been able to have little or no research on what happens when it is unattended.These studies notwithstanding, was the first incident, that women who most breast screening will receive a higher cumulative incidence of invasive breast cancer over the next six years than the control group who had previously received little screening, the study found that!:
“Because the cumulative incidence among controls does not reach that of the shielded structure, we believe that many breast cancer detected by mammography forward screening repeatedly not to stop to be detected by screening at the end of 6 years, suggesting that the natural history of screen-detected invasive breast cancers of many is to spontaneously argument.”
These results were considered near blasphemous lot, but we need to dig really surprised that cancer regress spontaneously? As Sayer Ji from GreenMedInfo angegeben.com in a previous article:
“Given that breast cancer is not caused by a lack of body part screening, surgery, radiation and chemotherapy, it should not be understood to beryllium so hard that if the article has a chance to be given better to do it regularly will . And What better way to avoid it in order to promote healing as unnecessary diagnostic and surgical procedures as well as chemical and radiation exposure?”
False positives Deter Women from mammography follow-ups
Hopefully, the reduced number of women in their 40s always mammograms due to increased awareness of the dangers of the deep-rooted Verfahrens.Dennoch, a recent Australian study indicates the possibility that the reduction of mammograms could guard to the flooding rate of false-positive mammograms be seem as false-positive women from getting fully rescreened. In Western Australia, the false positive rate is about 44 of every 1,000 women screened.The study, published in the medical journal of Australia11 found that 67.6 percent of women obtained a UN agency, false-positive mammography effects were less susceptible to re-inspection in the following years, the Australian Science zurück.Berichtete Network12:
“Epidemiology, UWA Professor Fritschi Carver, who led the statistical analysis of the study says women who have a false-positive mammography tests have several that could be implemented in future deterrence of screening results.”It is possible that [more invasive tests] upsets people and they go:” I do not know that poverty happen again ‘, and thus they do not return, “says Professor Fritschi.
“I think it’s really important when women come in to have their further assessment … It is very strategic, we keep looking, because they have the ability to develop cancer in the future, so it is very important [ the patient] continues to do their performance. ”
Professor Fritschi said each test can have false positive and false-negative results and the mammography screening process was not always final …”There’s no point in just picking up from many pieces of biopsy or something from someone in the chest just to see if they got cancer. Therefore, we have a test that at least the retired population moves UN agency, are much more susceptible to cancer and then have further tests only her. ”
The authors concluded, “Mammography Screening Population Services should its low false-positive result to forbid women to be deterred by the previous screening.” This is easier said than done, however.In addition, the wisdom of the ever-diverging your breasts caused by ionizing energy that we detect cancer in an effort to treat cancer is detected early enough, at best, questionable …
While the medical consortium must certainly avoid focusing on the reduction of positive imitation of overtreatment, there are other alternatives that can give you in monitoring your breast health and give you an indication of cancer risk in emergency shelter to ionizing radiation.And while Professor Fritschi was referring to splurge on when the auditions for those with an increased risk and identify mammography “further examination only to them:” The elevated rates of false positives are told that mammography is ineffective for this Mission.Falsche Negative Another risk of mammography-
In addition to false positives that Pb, unnecessary treatments, there is also the risk of false-negative a feat, which means that a life-threatening cancer is lost. It is great to know that a failure to X-ray can not be equated with a clean bill of health.Anything can be a negative X-ray to tell you that if you have cancer, it is not large enough to be detected even for adults has. According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI):
“Overall, mammograms miss in the position, 20 percent of breast cancers that are currently on the example of screening.”
This is particularly important for women sincere in addition dense breast tissue.Forty-nine percent of women someone high body tissues density13 and mammography for dense breasts, the sensitivity is as low as 27 percent14-meaning about 75 percent of dense breasts, women are at risk of missing a cancer, if they rely solely on the mammogram. Even in digital mammography, the sensitivity is still less than 60 percent.
Thermography-A Physiological tests to monitor body part health aid
I recently interviewed Gaea Powell about the use of thermography as a way to lock your risk for breast cancer to monitor the long term. Thermographic breast appearance is brilliantly simple and completely non-toxic.It is as safe element to your photo gemacht.Er measures the infrared heat radiated from the body and translates this information into energy images. Thermography does not require a mechanical compression or ionizing energy, and may show signs of physiological changes due to inflammation and / or increased tumor-related blood flow seen around 8-10 years ago, mammography or a physical test can detect a mass.
As explained by Gaea:
“Thermography is a physiological audition, so it allows you, for all the physiological changes in an early stage element to search.How do we know if the doctor’s office, the first thing they want to do that you need to do is weigh you have taken your blood pressure go and let you taken your temperature. These are physiological tests, which ended in time for stability to be observed können.Es is the same kind of practice. Each person has their own unique thermal vascular roadmap and thermography allows us to observe that the roadmap over time. ”
Download Interview Transcript
It is important to understand that, fits like mammography, thermography has not diagnose cancer.It grants you access to unique track your data completely temperature-time, and changes in temperature and the symmetry can be pointed out that changes take place, for advanced or deteriorated. Higher temperature readings indicate higher levels of inflammation that lead to cancer können.Also if your thermogram shows areas of high inflammation, it does not mean you have cancer, but it lets you know you need to encode the inflammation, in order to avoid deterioration, and in some cases that the area will further evaluation.One of the most important things to look for your doctor will evaluate is, symmetry and stability over time, therefore, recommends Gaea thermograms astatine is getting regular intervals. So, you are collecting data that will be analyzed and evaluated are all able, over the years. To learn more, please listen to the interview above, or read through the submission of Transkript.New York Medical Malpractice Suits Banned All mammograms for Botched
How dangerous and inaccurate, like mammograms, it is worth wise, that the law in some states for medical malpractice suits enemy shields radiologist misdiagnosed mammograms. To St.David Perecman, a New York personal injury lawyer15:
“Under the law in New York, the statute of limitations for medical malpractice and some two years shall apply from the date of the malpractice. This limitation is only moved when a is in the foreign object found in a body after an operation or a person discharging A continuous treatment of the physical, commits malpractice. So consider this 40 year old woman has a mammogram performed hypothetisch.Eine. If the radiologist x-ray film element reads or does not notice a potential tumor.For whatever drive is the woman not another mammogram until three ELD get later, when she finds a big lump in the breast. A new mammography detected the tumor in her chest and one oncologist determined the tumor is malignant.
Under the city statute, the statute of limitations bars the wife from bringing a medical malpractice lawsuit against the radiologist. Furthermore, under Nykorchuck v. Henriques, is great exception to the statute of limitations does not apply to mammograms. Nykorchuck v.Henriques, 78 N.Y.2d 255 (1991). ”
This is not necessarily true for all says, however.For variety, in 2008, a woman with terminal cancer won a body part medical malpractice suit in Tennessee, after receiving a false-negative mammography diagnosis16 that delayed the discovery of a fatal tumor for three years.
How to Help Prevent Breast Cancer
According to the National Breast Cancer Foundation, 200 000 diagnosed cases of breast cancer module bright glucinium each year in the United States, making it 3 times more than agreed with other gynecologic cancers.Prevention of breast cancer is important distant and more powerful than simply trying to recognize it, so I appreciate the poverty of my top tips on how to prevent this disease teilen.In to the largest review of research into lifestyle and cancer, the American Institute of Cancer Research that could roughly 40 percent of U.S. breast cancer cases can be prevented if people made beryllium wiser lifestyle choices. I think those estimates are too low extremes, and it is likely that 75 percent to 90 percent of cancers of the body through the strict application of the recommendations could be avoided below.Avoid artificial sweetener, fructose mainly. All forms of sugar are harmful to health in general and promote cancer. Fructose, however, is clearly one of the most deadly and should be avoided as much as realistic.
Optimize your vitamin D D.Vitamin affects virtually every cell in the body and is one of the most compelling natural cancer fighter.
Vitamin D is actually able to enter cancer cells induces apoptosis (cell death).When JoEllen Welsh, a researcher at the State University of New Rights at Albany, a potent form of vitamin D in human breast cancer cells injected, dry half of them up and died within a few days. Vitamin D has virtually tamoxifen in killing cancer cells as a toxic cancer drug, without the harmful side effects and at a fraction of the cost.
If you have cancer, you should your vitamin D-Flat 70-100 ng / ml. Food D works synergistically in the vicinity of each cancer treatment I am aware, no adverse effects in the vicinity.I suggest you try to find my free one-hour lecture to vitamin D in order to remember more.
Get tons of natural vitamin A. There is some evidence that vitamin A plays a role in the prevention of breast cancer. It is best to get it to vitamin A-rich foods, a little bit as a supplement. Your best sources are organic egg yolks, butter, raw, natural whole milk, beef or chicken and liver. But to complement beware, because there is some evidence that A steep food you can take advantage of vitamin D.As appropriate vitamin D levels are essential to negate your health in general, not to mention cancer prevention, this means that it is important to have the proper ratio of aliment D to vitamin A in Körper.Idealerweise you have all the nutrients to A and D substrate your body needs in a way that allows your device to regulate both systems naturally. This is best accomplished by swallowing chatoyant vegetables (for vitamin A) and giving your skin daily to safe sun sets (all of the vitamin D) performed.Get adequate amounts of iodine. Iodine is an essential part of evidence for the synthesis of hormones and the removal of it can also cause or contribute to the necessary development of a range of health problems, plus breast cancer. This is because your breasts to absorb and use a lot of iodine, which they need for proper cellular Funktion.Jodmangel or failure in one part of the body will lead to dysfunction of the tissue and tumors are a possibility.However, there are meaningful controversy about the appropriate dosage, allowing you to use caution in this state. There is evidence that winning mega-doses, double-digit milligram range can be counter-productive. A recent study suggests it might not be wise to get more than about 800 mcg of iodine per day, or the addition of as much as 12-13 mg (MCG 12000-13000) could potentially have many negative effects of power.
Avoid xenoestrogens. Xenoestrogens are chemicals mimic unreal, the natural estrogens.They have become a fan-shaped area of human health effects, including reduced gamete counts in men and accrued risk of breast cancer in women have been associated. There are a large number of xenoestrogens, such as bovine growth hormones in commercial milk products, such as used plastic bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates and parabens in their own skin care products and chemicals in nonstick materials, to name just a nickname hardly any.
Increase your insulin receptor sensitivity.The best way to do this is by avoiding sugar and grains, and the development ensures that you exercise regularly, ideally, past which the principles of peak fitness.
Maintain a healthy body weight. This will come naturally if you are eating right for your nutritional type, and the exercise is to beginnen.Es important to lose excess body fat, because fat produces steroids, which can fuel breast cancer.
Bypassing charring your meat. Charcoal or flame-broiled food is associated with an increased breast cancer risk.Carcinogen-acrylamide is formed when starchy foods parched, roasted or fried-stored, was to increase breast cancer risk, are sent as.
Avoid products with no added soy. Unfermented soy is rich in plant estrogens, or phytoestrogens, also known as isoflavones. In some studies, soy seems in agreement with the quality of breast cell proliferation, steroid, the work increases the chances increase for all mutations and cancer cells.
Drink one liter per day bio-food green vegetables.Please check my juicing instructions for more detailed information
Get plenty of high-quality animal omega-3 fats, given krill oil. Omega-3 deficiency is rampant underlying factor for cancer.
Curcumin. This is the active ingredient in turmeric and within the last concentrations may be very useful in the treatment of cancer body part. It shows immense therapeutic latent in the prevention of breast cancer metastases. It is important to note that curcumin is generally not absorbed that well, so I when several absorption peaks in a previous article.Baulk drink at admission, or at least limit your alcoholic drinks to one per day.
Breastfeed exclusively for up to 6 months. Research shows this is your breast cancer risk to you reduzieren.Vermeiden wearing underwire bras. There are a lot of data to the metal underwire bras breast cancer increase your risk.
SideStep electromagnetic fields as far as possible. Items such as electric blankets can be particularly annoying and increase your risk of cancer.
References:
All references
